Haaland leads the captain rankings for Gameweek 5 with a projected 8.18 points, though his ownership of 72.2% means most managers will make the same choice. Saka and Groß offer slightly lower projections but with significantly reduced ownership, while several differential options present contrasting risk-reward profiles against varying fixture difficulties.

Captain options for Gameweek 5
Player Team Opponent Form Projected Owned Price Why
Haaland Man City Sunderland (H) 8.2 8.2 72.2% £15.5m Haaland projects 8.18 points against Sunderland at home, where Man City face a difficulty rating of 2. His form of 8.2 and 72.2% ownership make him the consensus pick.
Saka Arsenal Brighton (A) 7.5 7.9 12.0% £9.5m Saka projects 7.88 points with form of 7.5. Arsenal travel to Brighton, rated difficulty 4, though Saka's ownership at 12.0 remains relatively modest.
Groß Brighton Arsenal (H) 8.2 6.9 18.0% £5.6m Groß projects 6.85 points with form of 8.2 and faces Arsenal at home with Brighton rated difficulty 4. At 5.6 price and 18.0% ownership, he offers value and contrarian appeal.
B.Fernandes Man Utd Fulham (A) 7.2 6.7 42.0% £12.0m B.Fernandes projects 6.73 points with form of 7.2, but Man Utd travel to Fulham, rated difficulty 4. His 42.0% ownership remains substantial despite mid-table projection.
Gibbs-White Nott'm Forest Coventry City (H) 6.5 6.7 11.3% £7.9m Gibbs-White projects 6.66 points with form of 6.5 against Coventry City at home, where Nott'm Forest face difficulty 2. His 11.3% ownership offers differentiation.
Bogle Leeds Crystal Palace (H) 9.2 6.3 2.5% £4.5m Bogle projects 6.26 points with exceptional form of 9.2 against Crystal Palace at home, where Leeds face difficulty 3. His 2.5% ownership makes him the standout differential.
João Pedro Chelsea Brentford (A) 8.2 6.2 75.1% £7.8m João Pedro projects 6.2 points with form of 8.2, but Chelsea travel to Brentford, rated difficulty 3. His 75.1% ownership means most managers already have him captained.
Tavernier Bournemouth Liverpool (H) 7.2 6.0 5.1% £6.1m Tavernier projects 6.01 points with form of 7.2 against Liverpool at home, where Bournemouth face difficulty 4. His 5.1% ownership provides differential value.

Haaland leads the projections

Projected 8.2 Sunderland (H)
Form 8.2
Owned 72.2%
Differential captains
Player Team Opponent Projected Owned Why
Bogle Leeds Crystal Palace (H) 6.3 2.5% Bogle's form of 9.2 is exceptional, and he projects 6.26 points at home to Crystal Palace with Leeds rated difficulty 3. His 2.5% ownership offers maximum differentiation.
Tavernier Bournemouth Liverpool (H) 6.0 5.1% Tavernier projects 6.01 points with form of 7.2 and faces Liverpool at home where Bournemouth are rated difficulty 4. His 5.1% ownership provides contrarian appeal.
Schade Brentford Chelsea (H) 5.7 5.5% Schade projects 5.71 points with form of 7.5 and plays at home to Chelsea, where Brentford face difficulty 4. His 5.5% ownership makes him a true differential.
Davis Ipswich Town Everton (A) 5.7 6.0% Davis projects 5.67 points with form of 5.8 and travels to Everton, rated difficulty 2. His 6.0% ownership and 4.0 price offer budget-friendly differentiation.
Gameweek 5 fixtures
Kick-off Home Away
Fri 18 Sept, 19:00 Brentford 4 Chelsea 3
Sat 19 Sept, 11:30 Spurs 3 Aston Villa 3
Sat 19 Sept, 14:00 Brighton 4 Arsenal 3
Sat 19 Sept, 14:00 Everton 2 Ipswich Town 3
Sat 19 Sept, 14:00 Newcastle 2 Hull City 3
Sat 19 Sept, 16:30 Nott'm Forest 2 Coventry City 3
Sun 20 Sept, 13:00 Leeds 3 Crystal Palace 3
Sun 20 Sept, 13:00 Man City 2 Sunderland 5
Sun 20 Sept, 13:00 Bournemouth 4 Liverpool 3
Sun 20 Sept, 15:30 Fulham 4 Man Utd 3

Common questions

Who is the best captain for Gameweek 5?

Haaland projects 8.18 points against Sunderland at home and leads all options, though his 72.2% ownership means most managers will select him. Saka and Groß offer lower projections with substantially reduced ownership.

Should I captain a differential in Gameweek 5?

Bogle presents the strongest differential option, combining exceptional form of 9.2 with a 6.26-point projection and just 2.5% ownership. Tavernier and Schade offer further contrarian alternatives.

Read next